freegasil.blogg.se

2017 arq backup review
2017 arq backup review









2017 arq backup review
  1. #2017 arq backup review android
  2. #2017 arq backup review software
  3. #2017 arq backup review windows
2017 arq backup review

Its restoration process is far less cumbersome than Backblaze’s and speedier than IDrive’s, too. During setup, Arq Premium encourages (but doesn’t require) you to use a private encryption key for a secure backup.

#2017 arq backup review software

The Arq Premium software gives you a lot of control over how your backup works, including options to choose how long to keep files around, to select any external drives, and more. Arq Premium supports up to five computers, and if you need more than the included 1 TB of storage, it’s an additional $0.00599 per gigabyte each month (which amounts to about $6 per terabyte each month, making it more expensive than Backblaze and IDrive for data hoarders).

#2017 arq backup review windows

Your new bill is 200.If you like to configure software to meet your specific needs, Arq Premium, available for Windows and Mac, offers far more customization options than Backblaze or IDrive and costs less than both for 1 TB of storage. Will this count as another 200 GB and now you are paying 0.5 cents times 400 GB?! Or since the 2 versions are almost identical, except maybe few files changed (say 100 MB), only the total initial data that is counting (i.e: 200 GB)? Or it is now 200.10 GB because of the double 100 MB files? Tomorrow there is another version that ARQ will create. I know that the following is probably a dumb question, but how exactly is ARQ versioning counting towards your bill?

2017 arq backup review

Both Arq and Duplicacy allow you to backup to local drives (either directly attached or NAS), and cloud storage. Whichever solution you choose, I highly recommend using local storage as well. For context, one of my backups is 1.3TB, and each hourly backup (checks all the files to see if anything changed) only takes 5 seconds.ĭuplicacy is a bit more involved to setup, so I currently only recommend it for more technical users. It does deduplication across multiple computers (so your backups take up less space), allows concurrent backups, is faster than ArqBackup, and I prefer its restore process. Duplicacy Web Edition, the most advanced backup solution I've ever seen. Same as above, but you can choose your own storage destination, both in the cloud and/or locally:ģ. Arq Cloud Backup, it's essentially Apple Time Machine in the cloud, and backups your data directly to Wasabi without you having to configure anything:Ģ. I'll give some solutions I've used, in order from ease of use.ġ. However, Arq is a lot more complicated to set up than Backblaze. It'll also be cheaper for me in the long run. I don't currently have a NAS, but Arq supports backups of mounted network drives in Windows.

#2017 arq backup review android

I can de-select directories that have frequently changing large files where I do not need to keep old versions, like Android phone images or VMs, for my cloud backups. I like Arq because I can use one program to manage my local and cloud backups. I tried Backblaze (the service, not B2) for a while and was unimpressed with its level of customization. My cloud backup costs me less than $1/month since I only have about 200 GB in the cloud. B2 is very simple: 0.5¢/GB/month for storage, and 1.0¢/GB for downloads. Some of the cloud services have complicated pricing schemes. This page on the Arq web site compares and walks through some of the options. I use Arq and back up concurrently to a local external HDD and a remote Backblaze B2 bucket.











2017 arq backup review